<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business, Employment and Real Estate Law in Ohio &#187; Business, Employment and Real Estate in Ohio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ryanrivchun.com/tag/flsa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ryanrivchun.com</link>
	<description>The legal blog of Ryan Rivchun on business, employment and real estate in Ohio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 13:30:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Employees are protected from retaliation for making a verbal complaint under the Wage and Hour Laws (FLSA)</title>
		<link>http://ryanrivchun.com/2011/03/employees-are-protected-from-retaliation-for-making-verbal-complaint-under-the-wage-and-hour-laws/</link>
		<comments>http://ryanrivchun.com/2011/03/employees-are-protected-from-retaliation-for-making-verbal-complaint-under-the-wage-and-hour-laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rivchun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanrivchun.com/?p=752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Supreme Court just held employers are prohibited from firing employees that made a verbal (not written) complaint alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (29 USC 201) in the case of Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.  A copy of the opinion, decided today, is available here. A good discussion of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/" target="_blank">US Supreme Court </a>just held employers are prohibited from firing employees that made a verbal (not written) complaint alleging violations of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Labor_Standards_Act" target="_blank">Fair Labor Standards Act </a>(<a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/129/usc_sup_01_29_10_8.html" target="_blank">29 USC 201</a>) in the case of Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.  A copy of the opinion, decided today, is available <a href="http://ryanrivchun.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/2011-03-22-Kasten-Opinion.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>. A good discussion of the oral arguments is available from John Hyman&#8217;s blog available <a href="http://www.ohioemployerlawblog.com/2010/10/kasten-v-saint-gobain-oral-argument.html" target="_blank">here. </a>This decision resolved a split of the Circuit courts about whether or not oral complaints where covered under the anti-retaliation clause of the FLSA.</p>
<p>In this case, the Supreme Court address conduct by the employer involving the use of time clocks in an inconvenient location that resulted in the employees not receiving credit for work time spent donning and doffing (putting on their work gear). Kasten made a verbal complaint to the company about the time clock location but did not submit a written complaint. This decision is consistent the anti-retaliation protections available to workers under <a href="http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm" target="_blank">Title VII of the Civil Rights Act </a>and is consistent with the position advanced by the <a href="http://www.dol.gov/" target="_blank">US Department of Labor. </a></p>
<p><strong>What does this mean for employees? </strong></p>
<p>This is a significant win for employees. Previously employees often had to rely on written documentation of a complaint to their employer to substantiate a claim for a retaliatory termination. Now, employees will be able to rely on verbal testimony where they may or may not be formal written records of a complaint.</p>
<p><strong>What does this mean for employers?</strong></p>
<p>There will likely be increased claims for a retaliatory termination under the FLSA based upon verbal complaints to supervisors. Employers will need to be diligent in having a consistent policy of documenting all verbal, oral, email or written complaints under the FLSA. Employers may want to demonstrate (i) has a consistent policy of documenting all verbal and written complaints, and (ii) the absence of any record of a complaint (oral or written) from the terminated employee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryanrivchun.com/2011/03/employees-are-protected-from-retaliation-for-making-verbal-complaint-under-the-wage-and-hour-laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dept. of Labor publishes new guidance on break time for nursing mothers under the FLSA</title>
		<link>http://ryanrivchun.com/2010/07/dept-of-labor-publishes-new-guidance-on-break-time-for-nursing-mothers-under-the-flsa/</link>
		<comments>http://ryanrivchun.com/2010/07/dept-of-labor-publishes-new-guidance-on-break-time-for-nursing-mothers-under-the-flsa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rivchun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Start-Ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nursing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanrivchun.com/?p=583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United States Department of Labor (www.dol.gov) published new guidance this month in Fact Sheet #73 available here. The fact sheet sets forth 2 major requirements: Employers are required to provide &#8220;reasonable break time for an employee to express breast milk for her nursing child for 1 year after the child&#8217;s birth each time such [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United States Department of Labor (<a href="http://www.dol.gov/whd/index.htm" target="_blank">www.dol.gov</a>) published new guidance this month in Fact Sheet #73 available <a href="http://ryanrivchun.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/2010-07-Fact-Sheet-73.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>The fact sheet sets forth 2 major requirements:</p>
<ol>
<li>Employers are required to provide &#8220;reasonable break time for an employee to express breast milk for her nursing child for 1 year after the child&#8217;s birth each time such employee has need to express the milk&#8221; and</li>
<li>Employers are required to provide &#8220;a place, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from coworkers and the public, which may be used by an employee to express breast milk&#8221;</li>
</ol>
<p>The fact sheet also contains guidance on time and location of breaks, compensation, and clarifies which employers are subject to the requirements.</p>
<p><strong>What does this mean to businesses subject to these requirements? </strong></p>
<p>In general, employers will need to have a policy in place regarding break time to express breast milk and provide an area free from intrusion and the public (other than a bathroom) for employees to express breast milk. For many businesses, this may be a managers office, conference room or similar are that can be secured (i.e. locked) to prevent intrusion.</p>
<p><strong>What about other state law requirements?</strong></p>
<p>The fact sheet indicates that this release does not preempt state law that provides greater protection to employees</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryanrivchun.com/2010/07/dept-of-labor-publishes-new-guidance-on-break-time-for-nursing-mothers-under-the-flsa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employers cannot clock out employees (without pay) for down time during a shift</title>
		<link>http://ryanrivchun.com/2010/02/employers-cannot-clock-out-employees-for-down-time-or-waiting-time-during-a-work-shift/</link>
		<comments>http://ryanrivchun.com/2010/02/employers-cannot-clock-out-employees-for-down-time-or-waiting-time-during-a-work-shift/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rivchun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punching out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage and hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanrivchun.com/?p=420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A car wash in Tennessee recently found out the hard way that they are not permitted to continuously punch their employees in and out depending on the working needs of the car wash. This car wash would punch in their employees when cars pulled up, went through the car wash and were cleaned and dried [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ryanrivchun.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Carwash.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-423" title="Carwash" src="http://ryanrivchun.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Carwash-300x220.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="220" /></a>A car wash in Tennessee recently found out the hard way that they are not permitted to continuously punch their employees in and out depending on the working needs of the car wash. This car wash would punch in their employees when cars pulled up, went through the car wash and were cleaned and dried by the employees. The car wash would then punch each employee out (resulting in the employees not receiving pay) anytime there were no customers at the car wash.</p>
<p>A Story from <a href="http://nashvillecitypaper.com/" target="_blank">The City Paper in Nashville </a>reports that many employees reported for work at 7 AM, were punched in and out as many as a 12 times throughout the day and left work in the early evening. This paper <a href="http://nashvillecitypaper.com/content/city-news/car-wash-workers-file-suit-claiming-labor-law-violation" target="_blank">reported </a>that one employee worked approximately 40 hours per week but was only paid for 15 based upon this punch in and punch out system.</p>
<p>Under <a href="http://www.dol.gov/opa/aboutdol/lawsprog.htm" target="_blank">Fair Labor Standards Act </a>and in general, employers are required to pay employees that remain on call at the employer&#8217;s place of business. There is a FLSA <a href="http://www.dol.gov/dol/allcfr/ESA/Title_29/Part_785/29CFR785.17.htm" target="_blank">exemption </a>for employees that are  &#8220;on call.&#8221;  The US Wage and Hour Division published <a href="http://ryanrivchun.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/10-02-17-FLSA-Fact-Sheet-22-Hours-Worked-Under-The-Fair-Labor-Standards-Act-FLSA.pdf" target="_blank">Fact Sheet 22</a> to clarify that  &#8220;on call&#8221; employees are required to be paid if they remain on call at the  employer&#8217;s premises. The exemption is analyzed differently if the employee is permitted to leave the employer&#8217;s premises.</p>
<p>This car wash required all the employees to remain at car wash and jump into action as soon as a customer appeared. The car wash also punched out the employees (while requiring them to remain at the car wash) until the next customer appeared. This policy caused resulted in the employees not being paid for the time spent in between customers while they were required to remain at the car wash.  The FLSA does not permit this conduct.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://wpln.org/home.php" target="_blank">Nashville Public Radio website </a>has <a href="http://wpln.org/?p=7763" target="_blank">reported </a>that this case settled for $130,000.00 in back wages and the car wash has updated its employment policies.</p>
<p>Another typical problem specified in  Fact Sheet 22  is the compensation  of employee who remain at their desk while eating lunch and answering  the phone or doing paperwork. Time spent doing paperwork or answering  the phone is compensable under the FLSA because they have not been  completely relieved from duty. Employers are not permitted to require  their employees to punch out for lunch if they are required to answer  the phones or complete paperwork during this time.</p>
<p>Thanks to the <a href="http://www.overtimeadvisor.com/" target="_blank">Overtime Advisor </a>for <a href="http://www.overtimeadvisor.com/2010/02/articles/working-time/waiting-time-is-often-work-time-and-must-be-paid/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+OvertimeAdvisor+%28Overtime+Advisor%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">posting</a> about this.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/qmnonic/290129310/" target="_blank">image </a>above is <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/qmnonic/&quot;&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/qmnonic/&lt;/a&gt; / &lt;a rel=&quot;license&quot; href=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/&quot;&gt;CC BY 2.0&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;" target="_blank">used </a>under the creative commons license from <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/qmnonic/" target="_blank">Qmnonic</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryanrivchun.com/2010/02/employers-cannot-clock-out-employees-for-down-time-or-waiting-time-during-a-work-shift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Small business owners &#8211; The US Dept of Labor is enforcing wage and hour lawsuits against a single pizza shop</title>
		<link>http://ryanrivchun.com/2009/08/small-business-owners-the-us-dept-of-labor-is-enforcing-wage-and-hour-lawsuits-against-a-single-pizza-shop/</link>
		<comments>http://ryanrivchun.com/2009/08/small-business-owners-the-us-dept-of-labor-is-enforcing-wage-and-hour-lawsuits-against-a-single-pizza-shop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 13:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rivchun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Start-Ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recordkeeping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wage and hour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanrivchun.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Strategic HR Lawyer noted a recent story about the US Department of Labor filing a lawsuit against a small pizza shop on Long Island for possible violations of the minimum wage, overtime and record-keeping provisions of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. The news story is available here. This should serve as a reminder [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.strategichrlawyer.com/" target="_blank">Strategic HR Lawyer</a> <a href="http://www.strategichrlawyer.com/weblog/2009/08/even_the_smalle.html" target="_blank">noted </a>a recent story about the US Department of Labor filing a lawsuit against a small pizza shop on Long Island for possible violations of the minimum wage, overtime and record-keeping provisions of the federal <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.dol.gov');" href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/whd/flsa/" target="_blank">Fair Labor Standards Act</a>. The news story is available <a href="http://libn.com/blog/2009/08/27/pizzeria-sued-for-wage-overtime-violations/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>This should serve as a reminder that all employers, including the owners of a small pizza shop, must comply with the wage and hour laws and the governmental will investigate wage and hour complaints.</p>
<p>Responding to an investigation will be significantly easier if an employer has accurate records readily available.</p>
<p>Ohio, pursuant to <a href="http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/BillText126/126_HB_690_EN_N.pdf" target="_blank">HB 690 </a>and  <a href="http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/4111" target="_blank">Ohio Revised Code Chapter 4111</a>, requires employers to maintain (with certain exceptions) at least the following information for each employee:</p>
<ul>
<li>Name, address and occupation</li>
<li>Pay rate</li>
<li>hours worked for each day worked</li>
<li>amount paid for each day worked</li>
</ul>
<p>In general, this should be kept for all employees for the duration of the employees employment and 3 year thereafter. Employers are also required to provide payroll information to an employee or a person acting on behalf of the employee upon request and free of charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryanrivchun.com/2009/08/small-business-owners-the-us-dept-of-labor-is-enforcing-wage-and-hour-lawsuits-against-a-single-pizza-shop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Federal Minimum Wage increases today</title>
		<link>http://ryanrivchun.com/2009/07/new-federal-minimum-wage-increases-today/</link>
		<comments>http://ryanrivchun.com/2009/07/new-federal-minimum-wage-increases-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Rivchun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Start-Ups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimum wage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ryanrivchun.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The federal minimum wage increased today to $7.25 per hour from $6.55 per hour. The US Department of Labor has useful information about the increase. The State of Ohio has different minimum wage requirements and the Ohio minimum wage laws are available here. The Ohio Department of Commence has published the new minimum wage poster [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal minimum wage increased today to $7.25 per hour from $6.55 per hour. The <a href="http://www.dol.gov/compliance/guide/minwage.htm">US Department of Labor</a> has useful information about the increase.</p>
<p>The State of Ohio has different minimum wage requirements and the Ohio minimum wage laws are available <a title="Ohio Commerce Department" href="http://www.com.ohio.gov/laws/" target="_blank">here</a>. The Ohio Department of Commence has published the new minimum wage <a href="http://www.com.ohio.gov/laws/docs/laws_MinimumWagePoster2009.pdf">poster</a> which includes the new federal minimum wage information. Ohio&#8217;s minimum wage is currently $7.30 per hour with a few exceptions.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.wageandhourcounsel.com/" target="_blank">Wage and Hour Counsel </a>blog has discussed issues relating to the increase in the federal minimum wage <a href="http://www.wageandhourcounsel.com/2009/07/articles/minimum-wage/federal-minimum-wage-increases-july-24-2009/" target="_blank">here</a> and <a href="http://www.wageandhourcounsel.com/2009/07/articles/minimum-wage/minimum-wage-increases-set-for-july/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ryanrivchun.com/2009/07/new-federal-minimum-wage-increases-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

